Bok ride is short, Rassie beware

Brenden Nel

Those who have risen to the top of the professional coaching ranks talk about the rush of experiencing a massive win, the cyclical highs and lows of the job from week to week, and the importance of the now clichéd “processes and systems”.

For some, it is an extension of their glory days after playing careers draw to an end – an opportunity to stay in the game that gave them fame and sometimes fortune.

But then there are those coaches hungry for success, who can’t wait to prove their doubters wrong. They want to get to the top and they will do anything they can to leapfrog the next guy, to keep their careers alive in a game they have built their life around.

What has always astounded me is the lack of a long-term vision among these coaches for life after rugby. Sure, there are four-year cyclical plans, but every coach knows that he’s only a few games away from being fired – hence the planning doesn’t go further than the next season.

And every South African coach wants to get his hands on the Springboks.

Rassie Erasmus wanted to coach the Springboks from day one. We heard the rumours when Heyneke Meyer was coach, and we watched as he left for Munster when Allister Coetzee was appointed. In the end, the move served him well as he’s now got the job.

Like every other man that covets coaching the Green and Gold, he has moved mountains in his personal life to get there. The question is, what happens after this chapter in his coaching career?

This is not an examination of the coaching system, nor the merits of each coach, but it makes the point that coach’s long-term planning often doesn’t go further than reaching the top of the game.

Companies across the world employ HR people to plot career paths, to do career development and to ensure that the right mix of training, experience and a vision of the way forward is always there for employees. In the world of rugby contracts, this is as foreign as a straight answer at a press conference.

Last year I spoke to a top coach, one who is now enjoying his time in a cold training ground somewhere far away, about why he wanted to be the Bok coach. The conversation was terse at times, and honest. And I reminded him that, as a forty-something coach he was on the verge of reaching the pinnacle of his career. And then what?

It sounds cruel, but I asked whether, even if he did ascend to the top, how long he would be able to keep the job. We’ve seen some strong characters being hired and losing it eventually, succumbing to the pressures of the job and falling apart. The fact is, every Bok coach will be fired eventually. History shows that the job is not a long-term proposition.

And yet, they all want it. But what happens next, after they’ve tasted the success and failure of Test rugby, once they’ve experienced the highs of packed stadiums across the world, and vanquished their foes on the field?

There seems to be a feeling among these coaches that the job is never completely finished and perhaps that’s why there are many examples of coaches who just can’t let go. Some find their way in other teams, others start academies and work as consultants to other clubs across the globe, but you always get the sense that they long to be back in the Test arena.

Jake White, for instance, makes no bones about it. He’s forever offering his services and applying for that next job. In coaching terms, he is still young, has a lot to offer and is a good coach.

So, Rassie beware; think about a life after the Boks. It will come, and you will still be a young man. Top coaches always have a point to prove, there’s always another game to win.

But when you leave, the way you handle the next step will be your biggest challenge. Too few coaches ever bother to think about that.

- Brenden Nel

Let's chat

  • Barry Smith

    It is not so much a Coach problem, rather the fact that we have no succession planning in place for the top job! There is never anyone in place to pass the baton to, no support Programe for the new guy from the old, and no transfer of IP. This sort of structure creates individualism and that is exactly what we face!

  • Cobus Brits

    Rassie must have though long and hard about the coaching job. In his other capacity as director of rugby, he needs to look ahead to find a replacement for him as coach soonest because the Boks need a not only a good coach but more importantly someone in the upper echelons like Steve Tew of NZRU that knows rugby inside and out.

    We seem not to have institutionalized knowledge to draw from but forever put all on the coach and that is really setting him up for failure.

    If I am Rassie I would do take the Boks as coach to WC next year but make it clear that the likes of say a Nienaber is being being groomed for takeover.

    If Rassie fails as coach it will jeopardize his role as director of rugby too. I believe in the long run we need Rassie more as a director than a coach but obviously as shortterm coach for now seeing we have nothing else on the table and the kitty is almost empty.

  • Alasdair Fraser

    The thing I find so sad is that once you are a Bok head coach, you seem destined never to have a high-profile coaching position at franchise level again. Jake White is the only one to continuously apply for the job

  • Patrick Mundell

    The Bok coaching position must be the hardest coaching job in the world!He has to balance so many factors that other coaches don’t even have to think about.
    I wish Rassie every success and am excited to see what innovation he can bring to the job.
    I hope he is able to restore pride in the jersey.
    Jake White managed to do that- he didn’t hand out caps lightly.
    It has always disappointed me that once you have been Bok coach ( and fired)there is almost no chance of ever being reappointed.I think that White and Mallet, besides deserving longer first terms, should have been considered reappointment in the past( and the future?).
    Has any post- isolation coach had a second term after another coach has held the post in between?
    I suspect John Williams may have briefly-haven’t googled.
    All the best Rassie.
    I hope you can make us proud again and rekindle the lost rivalry with New Zealand.
    I’m tired of us being the laughing stock.🇿🇦

  • Barend

    Being a coach myself , I do not think Brendan Nell appreciates the reasons why one coaches.
    Firstly you coach because you love the sport, you want to be involved and if you are that kind of person, you will either move to coaching or administration after your playing years. If you are successful in your coaching job, you find that you move on and higher up, until you get the chance of coaching professionally, ie getting paid for doing it. This can be the ultimate destination , because you get paid for doing what you love in the first place. Sadly, most of us coaches have to stay in our original chosen careers, as all coaching careers do not pay enough. Therefore, if you are good enough and want it enough, you should eventually coach the Springboks. After your stint, you just go back and coach other teams again. If you were successful and learned to say the right things at the right times you will still coach at a high level. See Eddy Andrews and NOT Jake and Peter de Villiers.

Comments are closed.