Why copy league?

Brendon Shields

The way that rugby union is coached makes it clear that the gainline is considered to be the most important component of the game.

The buzz used to be around the breakdown, and more recently we became obsessed with linespeed. If you look closely, the infatuation is always with open-play events. Long gone are the days when we used to prioritise the scrum, the lineout, or the restart as the main area of innovation.

This is because New Zealand, Australian and English rugby coaches are so heavily influenced by the innovations in rugby league which they’re exposed to on a daily basis. Coaches from these countries subsequently travel the world to coach various teams, and these ‘league seeds’ get sprinkled about.

In South Africa, we try to copy what the Kiwis are doing, without understanding why the Kiwis and Australians play this way.

It’s a culture thing. They draw talent from boys who often cross codes, whereas in South Africa, France, Ireland and Argentina, the league effect should not be a factor. And yet we all currently play rugby pretty much the same way.

In 2006, I spent some time in Australia and really enjoyed watching league because their approach was just totally different. This month I have again had the good fortune of travelling Down Under, and this time I decided to throw myself head-first into the 13-man game to really understand what it’s all about.

Paul Dyer, head of player development at the Brisbane Broncos, kindly gave me access to their coaching approach and even invited me to observe a few training sessions. I was especially keen to see for myself what Paul referred to as “a move away from the gainline as the be-all and end-all”. Paul argues that the gainline is not nearly as important as the speed and momentum generated for the next phase of attack.

It was all very exciting until I actually attended a training session, only to realise that league and union are now a complete mirror image of each other as far as open play is concerned.

Lots of running for the sake of running. Passing for the sake of passing. Running screens for the sake of, well, running screens. Even the little stab kicks (when all else has failed) are 100% reminiscent of rugby union. It’s all very impressive once it gets going, but it’s also fairly static with the defense always having enough time to re-align for another bash.

I could have been watching the training session of any rugby union team today.

I don’t blame league. I really love the sport and I totally get why they play the game this way. League is all about a slow building-up of territory through the allowed 6 phases of possession. Thereafter they have to kick, with the 40/20 rule allowing the kicking team to win back possession. The ball is in ‘open play’ far more regularly, so innovation in this area will naturally occur more often in league.

What annoys me is that rugby union coaches seem to have gotten lazy. We are today so perplexed by the dynamics of open play that we no longer innovate strike plays from set-pieces. I for one just cannot buy the excuse that you have to first set up 9 static phases before trying to strike?

Watching a bit of league and studying the game makes you appreciate union all the more, because the lineout and the scrum are rather special things which totally whack the dynamic by screwing with the numbers.

My short time with rugby league however brought the realisation that, to a large extent, union does not want to be union anymore. We want to get those pesky set-pieces over with so we can have lots of open play – league style.

FRESH TAKE is an initiative to identify, feature and develop talented rugby writers who are not yet part of the mainstream media. If that sounds like you, send us a sample of a story you’d like to write to info@alloutrugby.com

Brendon Shields is currently the host of Rugbycology, an online training course where you learn to capture data and generate game statistics using pen, paper and online Google tools.

- Brendon Shields

Let's chat

  • Barry

    Brendon, what ever you do, don’t under any circumstances use the word “expansive”. It seems to be a motivator for some of the readership!

    The games are closely aligned in many ways, such that it would be strange to not expect some cross pollination in areas of public interest. Similarly with grid iron, where many of the review processes have been successfully adopted by Union. This is not all bad – the game needs to evolve in order to stay interesting, but I would agree, not to the extent that the fundamental identity is lost!

    • Chris

      For me League gets a little monotonous to watch after a while. I probably don’t get the nuances.
      Kind of feels like you’ve been watching 4 sevens games in a row.
      The set-pieces and planned moves that you get off them adds more of a chess match aspect to Rugby Union.
      I think the spectators are starting to miss this aspect of the game.

  • Tobokani

    Just watched the hurricanes highlanders game this morning and it was a much much better spectacle because the ref and the assistant refs policed the offside line very strictly.. This linespeed buzzword should just be substituted for offside because a majority of the time teams are plain offside.. But after being blown for like 7-8 offsides collectively in a short space of time, both teams adjusted and the respective attacking teams began to get some momentum with the ball without constantly getting man and ball at the same time… More policing of this linespeed phenomenon will result in a better spectacle all round me thinks

    • Chris

      How about adding another linesman to help police the gainline ?

      At the moment the ref simply cannot police this all of the time and players know exactly when he’s distracted.
      Those rush defenders will be less inclined to take the space if they know they have eyes behind them. I don’t even think it will cause more penalties as teams will have to adjust their defensive lines or loose.
      The rush defence of late has added nothing of value to the game from both a spectators or player point of view.

    • Greg Shark

      could not agree more…line speed is simply offside and RSA refs are ignoring it….so often on the tv screen it is plainly obvious that the opposing team is ahead of the last feet and the outside centre more often than not is already ‘petting’ his opposite number…..

    • SweetAz

      Yeah, was a decent game but the breakdown still wasn’t policed properly. I agree with you on the offsides policing but the problem is that it is so inconsistent between different officials that I think it needs to be taken out of officials hands and policed by technology. The same way we have DRS in cricket we can have a guy sitting with the TMO with a screen that has lines on it bringing up alarms as soon as infractions occur.

      • Barry

        Yes agreed, the rules generally are so complex now that it is rediculous to expect one puffed little Glen to police it all!

        Similar to hank eye at scrum time, it can be monitored off field and as soon as it is carefully monitored the infringements will stop!

    • Barry

      Yes good point Tobo, nice to watch, pretty close result!

      • John Comyn

        Not good news for the Sharks though :-)

        • Barry

          Well I can guarantee you that the Stormers will not progress up the log this week!

          • SweetAz

            LOL, neither will the snaaks.

          • John Comyn

            Yes – it’s nice to have a stress free weekend. Stormers supporters need a bye weekend as much as the players do!

    • John Comyn

      That is really good to hear.

Comments are closed.